Dipan Mehta
- Registered on: 22 Jan 2013
- Last connection: 30 Jan 2013
Issues
Activity
07 Apr 2013
- 18:18 Extended Fields Support: RE: Problem with list with multiple choices
- Check out issue #2176 and #2177. I think multiple select values are not handled correctly in this plugin. I have left...
22 Mar 2013
- 04:13 Extended Fields Bug #2177: Plugin breaks the display of multi-select lists
- Take a look at #2176. I have faced identical problem and also solved it myself. (Though I want more people to verify ...
20 Mar 2013
- 06:42 Extended Fields Bug #2176: Rendering of multi-select custom fields User and Version produces error
- Looks like I have cracked the issue.
The bug lies in the ...
17 Mar 2013
- 12:15 Extended Fields Bug #2176: Rendering of multi-select custom fields User and Version produces error
- I am attaching the log where it shows ...
- 12:08 Extended Fields Bug #2176 (Closed): Rendering of multi-select custom fields User and Version produces error
- I have installed extended fields 0.2.1 on Redmine 2.2.3.
Upon creating a custom field of type "User" of multiple ...
18 Feb 2013
- 14:46 Extended Fields Bug #2140: Custom field templates do not work under Redmine 2.2.x
- Thanks. This works now.
I have also tested this with the latest 2.2.3.
(Sorry for a delayed feedback.)
22 Jan 2013
- 14:36 Extended Fields Bug #2140: Custom field templates do not work under Redmine 2.2.x
- Yes. This is the only issue.
Andriy Lesyuk wrote:
> > Yes. It shows the text as is, without formatting.
>
> Is... - 12:23 Extended Fields Bug #2140: Custom field templates do not work under Redmine 2.2.x
- Yes. It shows the text as is, without formatting.
- 08:42 Extended Fields Bug #2140: Custom field templates do not work under Redmine 2.2.x
- Sorry I was referring to #2115 and #2116 - interchangeably. However, I have followed all instructions on both.
- 08:31 Extended Fields Bug #2140 (Closed): Custom field templates do not work under Redmine 2.2.x
- I am very keen on this plug-in as it is a very critical functionality and very effective.
I am following Bug #211...
Also available in: Atom